GRAPEFOX

Why a 35% Discount Requires 84% More Revenue to Break Even

Luca Fontani Founder Grapefox Consultancy for Fashion Brands
Written by Luca Fontani
Founder at Grapefox ยท Worked with 100+ fashion brands, from emerging labels to $100M+ companies.

A 35% discount doesn’t require 35% more sales. It requires +84% more revenue.

Most fashion brands are destroying their margins right now because they are doing “Revenue Math” instead of “Profit Math”.

I am watching 80% of the fashion brands I advise slash prices by 30-50% for Black Friday. When I open their unit economics, the room usually goes quiet.

At Grapefox, I built a simulator to visualize “Negative Operating Leverage.”

Let’s look at the actual math from the scenario in the image below: (actual client)

The Fashion Discount Trap Calculator

The Setup

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฝ

โ†ณ Original Price: โ‚ฌ120 (VAT EXCLUDED)

โ†ณ Variable Costs: โ‚ฌ55 (COGS, Shipping, Pick & Pack)

โ†ณ Original Profit: โ‚ฌ65

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜ (๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ% ๐—ข๐—ณ๐—ณ)

โ†ณ New Price: โ‚ฌ78

โ†ณ Variable Costs: Still โ‚ฌ55 (These don’t go down just because your price did)

โ†ณ New Profit: โ‚ฌ23

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ

You discounted the price by 35%, but you slashed your profit by nearly 65% (dropping from โ‚ฌ65 to โ‚ฌ23).

To make the exact same amount of total profit at the end of the day, you do not just need a little more volume. You need to generate +84% more revenue.

In practical terms: You now need to generate โ‚ฌ1.84 in sales just to equal the value of your old โ‚ฌ1.00.

Why You Need to Ship 3x the Units

๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ ๐Ÿฏ๐˜… ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ (This is the part that catches founders off guard.)

To earn your original โ‚ฌ65 profit target:

โ†ณ Before the discount, you had to sell 1 unit (โ‚ฌ65 profit x 1)

โ†ณ After the discount, earning โ‚ฌ23 per unit, you now have to sell 2.8 units to hit that same โ‚ฌ65 target

๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—น๐˜† ๐Ÿฏ ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜†.

This creates massive Operational Debt:

โ†ณ 3x the packaging labor

โ†ณ 3x the shipping logistics

โ†ณ 3x the customer support tickets

โ†ณ 3x the return processing risk (and during and immediately after BF, they tend to be higher)

Unless you have massive operational slack and zero cash flow, this is a dangerous game.

The only times a discount this deep makes sense:

โ†ณ Liquidation: You are clearing dead stock to free up cash for new collections.

โ†ณ Survival: You desperately need cash flow today to pay bills tomorrow.

If you are doing it just because everyone else is, you aren’t executing a strategy.

We call it: “The blind leading the blind.”

Don’t let “Black Friday” turn into “Red Q4.”

Build a better fashion brand, one insight at a time...
Read more...
Close Popup

Build a better fashion brand, one insight at a time

Get battle-tested playbooks and unfiltered insights drawn from working with 100+ fashion labels.
Fashion Logos
No partnerships, sponsorships, or endorsements are implied.